Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2021/38652
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
30/07/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
According to department of justice, government of India, applicant may seek action either through registrar general High court of judicature at Allahabad or Government of Uttar Pradesh so chief minister office may entertain the grievance with relevant attachments. The matter concerns the irregularity in the district judge office at Lucknow comes under ambit of Government of U. P. .
Grievance Status for registration number : DEPOJ/E/2021/00864Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt 19/02/2021Received By Ministry/Department Justice
Grievance Description- An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to seek justice for a senior citizen crushed because of rampant corruption in the public system of the government of India. Request made to Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for action, as appropriate. Current Status Case closed Date of Action 09/12/2019 Remarks The grievance has been forwarded to Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for action, as appropriate. It is an unfortunate that Registrar took under teeth the request made by the ministry of justice, Government of India. Whether it does not reflect the tyranny of Indian judiciary which overlooked rule of law. Consequently, applicant requests to take action in the matter, and they may fix accountability as required under the law. The government may not spare a wrongdoer irrespective of caste, creed, religion, status and rank. Undoubtedly it is too much surprising that post reached Lucknow from Mirzapur in 3 days, but it is unfortunate that it took more than 1 year but is still not reached the office of the subordinate judge which is dealing with the matter from the office of district judge Lucknow. Whether it is not a mockery of the law of land is being committed by the office of the District Judge, Lucknow itself? Current Status Case closed Date of Action 22/02/2021
Remarks-The administrative control over the subordinate judiciary in the States vests with the concerned High Court and the respective State Government. The petitioner, if so advised, to approach the appropriate forum to resolve the grievance.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number DEPOJ/E/A/21/0000074
Appeal Text -The matter concerns the failure of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh. When both administration and court overlooked the grievances concerned with the deep-rooted corruption, then in frustration, door of ministry of law and justice knocked. When Registrar general also overlooked the representation of the applicant forwarded by the ministry of justice, then think about the status of rule of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Please forward the matter to registrar general High court of judicature as reminder because to overlook the forwarded can never be in accordance with the framework of the constitution. Current Status Appeal Closed Remarks- I have gone through the final reply of PG Officer of this Department. I have also gone through the points raised in the appeal. It is reiterated that the administrative control over the subordinate judiciary in the States vests with the concerned High Court and the respective state Government. If the appellant so desire, he may approach Registrar General of the High court with his grievance. Officer Concerns ToOfficer Name- Shri Niraj Kumar GayagiOfficer Designation-Joint Secretary
Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
30/07/2021
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/57666
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
06/10/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh.
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/38652
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt 30/07/2021
Received By Ministry/Department, Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description-According to department of justice, government of India, applicant may seek action either through registrar general High court of judicature at Allahabad or Government of Uttar Pradesh so chief minister office may entertain the grievance with relevant attachments. The matter concerns the irregularity in the district judge office at Lucknow comes under ambit of the Government of U. P. For the more details vide the attached document to the representation.
According to the department of justice, government of India, applicants may seek action either through registrar general High court of judicature at Allahabad or Government of Uttar Pradesh so chief minister office may entertain the grievance with relevant attachments. The matter concerns the irregularity in the district judge office at Lucknow comes under ambit of the Government of U. P.
Appeal closed by department of justice with the remark as
I have gone through the final reply of the PG Officer of this Department. I have also gone through the points raised in the appeal. It is reiterated that the administrative control over the subordinate judiciary in the States vests with the concerned High Court and the respective state Government. If the appellant so desires, he may approach the Registrar General of High court with his grievance.
Current Status Under process
Date of Action 30/07/2021 Officer Concerns To Officer Name Shri Bhaskar Pandey Officer Designation Joint Secretary
India's judicial system needs to give priority to common man, Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju said on Saturday at the Bar Council of India's felicitation event for Chief Justice NV Ramana while he stressed: "Justice delayed is justice denied". ... "Law has often been seen as a rich man' profession
Contact Address Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
25/10/2021
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
How the matter can be considered as redressed if the matter forwarded to those who are not concerned with the matter? This matter concerns district judge Lucknow because of mismanagement the representation of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh is languishing in the office of district judge Lucknow. This representation addressed to A.C.J.M. III, district court, District Lucknow. Crime number- 269 of year 2009 received by the office of district Judge Lucknow in just three days from the date of despatch but still not reached to addressee in two years 15 days. Such dereliction on the part of staff reflects mismanagement in the working of District Judge Lucknow. Government of Uttar Pradesh specially its chief minister office arbitrarily forwarded it to Mirzapur police and Chauki in-charge Bali Maurya could not understand it. Now grievance has been disposed of by Officer Name- Shri Bhaskar Pandey Officer Designation-Joint Secretary incriminatory without sending to concerned mandate.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
Tags:
Judiciary
How the matter can be considered as redressed if the matter forwarded to those who are not concerned with the matter? This matter concerns district judge Lucknow because of mismanagement the representation of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh is languishing in the office of district judge Lucknow. This representation addressed to A.C.J.M. III, district court, District Lucknow. Crime number- 269 of year 2009 received by the office of district Judge Lucknow in just three days from the date of despatch but still not reached to addressee in two years 15 days.
ReplyDelete