Whether on the large scale blatant abuse of Cr.P.C. 107/116 by the police sub-inspectors is justified even when it is preventive measure




संदर्भ संख्या : 60000210126014, दिनांक - 26 Aug 2021 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-60000210126014

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-The matter concerns the Director General of Police so may not be forwarded to subordinates to deviate the attention from the real issues which comes under the ambit of D.G.P. office and maintainable by wide public interest. Official mobile number of the applicant is 7379105911.An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to make enquiry regarding the misuse of Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C. on the large scale by the police in the state of Uttar Pradesh instead of adopting logistic approach in transparent and accountable manner. As following is the fundamental duties of every citizen of this country. h- to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of enquiry and reform- to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement Everyone knows that proceedings under Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C. are only preventive measures and not pure criminal proceedings, but such proceedings are of quasi judicial nature, while the offence of my son is inviting pure criminal proceedings, so my matter is not amenable under section 107/116. Herewith written application addressed to superintendent of police Mirzapur is attached to this representation signed by the aggrieved. D.G.P. office is the monitoring head of department of police in the state of Uttar Pradesh through which state government monitors and ensures the law and order in the state. It is the foremost responsibility of the D.G.P. office to safeguard the rights of people and curb the misuse of provisions of law of land. 1-Whoever seek redressal of their grievances by submitting online applications on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh, concerned sub-inspector fabricate them under Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C in most of the cases. Please provide the measures taken by the D.G.P. office to curb the misuse Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C. including copy of the circulars issued through the office.2-The job of police is to be instrumental in providing criminal justice, specially to justice seekers and police in most of the cases lodge F.I.R. under Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C. which is preventive measure. Please provide the minutes of proceedings and circulars issued to check the trend of local police who have made illegal practices to misuse the Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C.in order to provide justice by the D.G.P. office. 3-Police in general to wreak vengeance with the human rights defenders, R.T.I. Activists and social workers whose general aim is to struggle for betterment society slaps charges of breach of peace to suppress their voices. Please provide the circulars issued by the government to curb the misuse of power by the local police under aforementioned circumstances.

विभाग -शिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-25-08-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -जनपद स्तरपद -जिलाधिकारी

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक26-08-2021 को फीडबैक:-Undoubtedly Cr.P.C. 107116 is not privilege of the police because it is subjected to scrutiny by the competent authorities of the government. If someone made allegations regarding the misuse of this tool, then to ensure transparency and accountability, its use by competent offers of the police must be checked. Here report of the subinspector Bali Maurya is quire relevant that matter must be investigated by the officer nominated by D.G.P. office as it can not be investigated by a Chauki incharge or circle officer because their purview is limited. They also do not have data and underprivileged to access such data. But one thing is too much unconstitutional that checking of misuse of aforementioned tool by the police still awaiting the heed of accountable public functionaries in the state who are closing the chapter by overlooking this serious issue causing human rights violations of the citizenry on the large scale in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

फीडबैक की स्थिति -फीडबैक प्राप्त

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक

1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 10-08-2021 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-मिर्ज़ापुर, 25-08-2021 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित

2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 10-08-2021 नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 25-08-2021 अनुमोदित . निस्तारित

3 आख्या वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक (पुलिस ) 11-08-2021 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी , नगर ,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर 25-08-2021 akhay preshit . निस्तारित

4 आख्या क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त (पुलिस ) 11-08-2021 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक-कोतवाली कटरा,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 14-08-2021 आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है। निस्तारित

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Undoubtedly Cr.P.C. 107116 is not privilege of the police because it is subjected to scrutiny by the competent authorities of the government. If someone made allegations regarding the misuse of this tool, then to ensure transparency and accountability, its use by competent offers of the police must be checked.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post