On 1 Jan 2020, UPSIC imposed penalty of Rs.25000 but not recovered from concerned secretary now his plea is registered for revocation

 Penalty had to be recovered from the errant secretary of the gram panchayat so that he did not dare to defy the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. After one and half years he filed an appeal against the order of the commission to revoke imposed penalty imposed on him by commission and the commission accepted it. Think about the gravity of the situation that not single PIO is being punished by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission which root cause of not providing information to the information seekers. 






Registration Number DMOBD/A/2021/60012

Name Hariom Ojha

Date of Filing 26/06/2021

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 26/06/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454417639

Email-ID admfr.sr-up@gov.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE BHADOHI

   

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number DMOBD/R/2021/60009

Request Registration Date 16/03/2021

* Name Hariom Ojha

Gender Male

* Address Village Ojhapur , Block Deegh, Tahsil Gyanpur

Pincode 221310

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Pincode Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-8009143310

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

* PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Here date of submitting the R.T.I. Communique is 16/03/2021 and today is 26/06/2021 and this communique is not forwarded by the office of the district magistrate Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi to the concerned. 

Sir,  public information officer concerned must provide within time as stipulated under subsection  1 of section 7 but unfortunately he remained failed. According to the aforementioned provision of Right Information Act 2005, a public information officer has to provide information within the stipulated time of 30 day. This 30 days is counted from the date of receipt of RTI Communique in the office of public authority. Without any doubt, Public Information Officer failed to provide information and did not communicate the reason for not providing information. Action must be taken against the PIO concerned for still not providing information. Violation of provisions of transparency act by the PIO can not be overlooked by the senior rank officer who will entertain this first appeal. Whether it is not a mockery of the law of land and showing the complete lawlessness and anarchy in the government machinery in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Right to Information act 2005 was brought of to promote transparency and accountability in the public offices, but it seems that because of corruption its benefits are not reaching to the citizens of this country moreover its provisions are being diluted again and again and by the corrupt public functionaries in this largest democracy in the world which is the outcome of this non-constructive approach and procrastination in providing the information by the Public Information Officers. 

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

Registration Number DMOBD/R/2021/60009

Name Hariom Ojha

Date of Filing 16/03/2021

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 16/03/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454417639

Email-ID admfr.sr-up@gov.in

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE BHADOHI

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DMOBD/R/2021/60009

Date of Filing 16/03/2021

* Name Hariom Ojha

Gender Male

* Address Village Ojhapur , Block Deegh, Tahsil Gyanpur

Pincode 221310

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Pincode Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-8009143310

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought The matter concerns the Village panchayat Ojhapur Development Block- Deegh Tahsil Gyanpur District- Bhadohi. D. M. Sant Ravidas Nagar  Bhadohi nominated enquiry officer to additional chief officer, district panchayat Bhadohi on 20-Jan-2020 quite obvious from page 2 of annexure as PDF to the representation. Page 1 of annexure itself revealing the cause of delay in the enquiry.  

1-On 15 March 2021, Aforementioned enquiry officer may provide details of complainants supporting the enquiry and Total number of complainants.

2-Any complainant sought postponement of date of enquiry. Please provide detail. Provide a reason for rejecting the request. 3-Provide the copy of the enquiry report. 

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))


Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Penalty had to be recovered from the errant secretary of the gram panchayat so that he did not dare to defy the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. After one and half years he filed an appeal against the order of the commission to revoke imposed penalty imposed on him by commission and the commission accepted it. Think about the gravity of the situation that not single PIO is being punished by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission which root cause of not providing information to the information seekers.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post