google-site-verification: google652ee2e18330a276.html Yogi as anti-corruption crusader: Why PIO Lucknow Development Authority Tahsildar Rajesh Shukla did not provide information even after direction of FAA?

Sunday, 18 April 2021

Why PIO Lucknow Development Authority Tahsildar Rajesh Shukla did not provide information even after direction of FAA?












Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Tahsildar Rajesh Shukla of L.D.A. made the mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 showing his insolence to provisions of the Act.
1 message

Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 8:05 PM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, "presidentofindia@rb.nic.in" <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, "sec.sic@up.nic.in" <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, "hgovup@up.nic.in" <hgovup@up.nic.in>, "cmup@up.nic.in" <cmup@up.nic.in>, "csup@up.nic.in" <csup@up.nic.in>, "uphrclko@yahoo.co.in" <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, ldartionline@gmail.com
No one may be allowed to take the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 under teeth irrespective of rank and status.
An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 against denial of sought information by the public information officer/Tahsildar Rajesh Shukla of Lucknow Development Authority ipso facto obvious from attached order of the First Appellate Authority. 
To 
                                                  Chief Information Commissioner 
                                                   U.P. Information Commission
                                                                7/7A, RTI Bhawan,
                                                                 Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar
                                                                   Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Prayer-PIO of Lucknow Development Authority took under teeth the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 and he overlooked the direction of the FAA to upload the sought information on the R.T.I. portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh therefore it is a fit case to impose pecuniary penalty on him under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005. 

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention ofHon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows. 

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform; 

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence; 

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement. 

  2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following is the status of the submitted RTI communique under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005. 

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2020/80001
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 21/10/2020
Status REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PIO as on 28/01/2021
Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9918001667, Email Id:-
Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details.
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9918001643
Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following is the detail of information sought from PIO Lucknow Development Authority. 
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
 Personal Details of RTI Applicant:- Registration Number LKDPA/R/2020/80001
Date of Filing 21/10/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh Gender Male  Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001 Country India State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:-40015719059911 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singh अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 11-09-2019 को मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय द्वारा अधीक्षण अभियंता मण्डल -लखनऊ,उ.प्र. आवास एवं विकास परिषद को प्रेषित और जिसका नियत तिथि 26-09-2019 थी श्रेणीकरण पूर्व निक्षेपित अधीक्षण अभियंता उ.प्र. आवास एवं विकास परिषद दिनांक 17-09-2019 को उपाध्यक्ष-लखनऊ,विकास प्राधिकरण को प्रेषित और जिसका नियत तिथि 26-09-2019 थी कृपया प्रकरण में नियमानुसार कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें C-श्रेणीकरण मंडलायुक्त दिनांक 29-09-2020 को उपाध्यक्ष-लखनऊ,विकास प्राधिकरण को प्रेषित और जिसका नियत तिथि 31-08-2020 थी कृपया प्रकरण का गंभीरता से पुनः परीक्षण कर नियमानुसार कार्यवाही करते हुए 07 दिवस में आख्या उपलब्ध कराए जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है आख्या प्रेषित, अनुमोदन लंबित 
Public information officer may provide the following information point wise as sought. 
1- The date fixed to dispose of the aforementioned grievance is 31/08/2020 and today is 05/10/2020 which means more than one month five days passed. Please provide the cause of undue delay even when the matter is concerned with the serious allegations of corruption. 
2- It is quite obvious that L.D.A. submitted its report in the matter but not attached to the grievance as a complainant it is natural to provide the report to the complainant but not done by them. Please provide the copy of the report and reason for not providing the report to the complainant cum information seeker. 
3- Please provide the certified and legible copies of the documents exchanged during the processing of the grievance by the public authority Lucknow development authority. 
4- Provide the minutes of the proceedings during the processing of the grievance. 
5- Whatever documents sought as reported through earlier communications must be provided in detail and detail of staff verified them.
* Concerned PIO Rajesh Shukla
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following is the status of the submitted appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005. 
Registration Number LKDPA/A/2021/60002
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 03/01/2021
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 18/01/2021
Reply :- Order passed, attached herewith.
View Document
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9918001643
Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com
 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following is the detail of the appeal submitted before the FAA  Lucknow Development Authority.  
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
 
* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
 
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number LKDPA/R/2020/80001
Request Registration Date 21/10/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Sangmohal post office, District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Rajesh Shukla
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Appellant sought information from commissioner Lucknow on 06/10/2020 online on the government website of the Government of Uttar Pradesh by paying requisite R.T.I. fee into the treasury of the government of Uttar Pradesh. The registration number of the aforementioned R.T.I. Communique is COLKW/R/2020/60020.  Since the matter concerns the irregularity of the public authority Lucknow Development Authority more closely therefore commissioner Lucknow Division forwarded the aforementioned R.T.I. Communique to Lucknow Development Authority.The registration number of the forwarded R.T.I. communique as aforementioned is LKDPA/R/2020/80001 and its date of registration is 21/10/2020.Under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005, provision categorically articulates that CPIO/PIO will provide information to the information seeker within stipulated 30 days from the date of receipt of the  R.T.I. Communique in the office of the public authority.  Ipso facto public information officer concerned, violated the aforementioned provision of the Right to Information Act 2005.Here violation of the aforementioned provision by PIO invites disciplinary action against PIO through F.A.A. Moreover PIO concerned under the direction of F.A.A. provide the point wise information as sought by the appellant.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
  6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the act of public information officer Lucknow Development Authority is not pardonable because he tried to conceal the information concerned with deep rooted corruption. Where is rule of law if PIO is above the law and law of land is handicapped to take action against him?

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा | 

             इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-18/04/2021           Yours sincerely

                              Yogi M. P. Singh, 

Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur

 Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001. 

LDA.pdf
749K

4 comments:

  1. THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005
    No. 22 of 2005
    [15th June, 2005.]
    An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for
    citizens to secure access to information under the control of public
    authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the
    working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information
    Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected
    therewith or incidental thereto.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The matter concerns the deep rooted corruption but it is unfortunate that Public Information Officer Lucknow Development Authority did not provide information but he concealed the information in order to shield the wrongdoers in Lucknow Development Authority.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Right to information act 2005 was brought up by the Government of India during the regime of the Congress to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public offices as the corruption was rampant in the government machinery but when the Bhartiya Janata party government came into power then it commenced to dilute the provisions of The right to information act 2005 and now the position of both yogi and Modi government is that not a single public information officer in the government is providing information to the information seekers which is quite obvious from the repeated denials of the informations by the public information officers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Undoubtedly they are not providing information to the information seeker, first, public information officer did not provide information when the appeal was submitted before the first appellate authority he passed the order to provide the information but it is unfortunate even after that public information officer tahsildar Rajesh Shukla did not provide the information as the matter was concerned with the deep rooted corruption and they are concealing the information because they know that Lucknow development authority will be exposed before the public if they will leak the information concerned with the deep rooted corruption.

    ReplyDelete

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Patient is suffering in this undeclared curfew in Uttar Pradesh because of breathing problem such is mismanagement Covid 19

  Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/21639 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 0...