Thursday, 1 April 2021

Whether it is not a mockery of R.T.I. Act 2005 but such practices are quite rampant in case of widows like Ekta Singh

 








4 comments:

  1. Sought information is as follows.

    1-You Hon’ble Sir may direct CPIO concerned to provide your applicant the cause of issue of debt recovery notice.

    2-Whether your applicant had applied for debt in the bank concerned? If yes provide the copy of the said application.

    3-Your applicant may be provided the detail of staffs who processed the debt application of your applicant.

    4-You Hon’ble Sir may provide the reason and name of the business which was to be initiated by your applicant by borrowing debt from bank concerned as she has no information and knowledge regarding any such transaction.

    5-Whether debt recovery notices are served by the banks arbitrarily? Who directed the bank to issue debt recovery notice to a widow itself facing the severe crunch of earnings for living being and maintenance of family?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Think about the gravity of situation that first appellate authority of the Punjab National Bank took action on the first appeal after 3 years which is a mockery of the law of land and violation of provisions of right to information act 2005 and most surprising thing is that no accountable public functionaries will take care of it as it seems that our public functionaries have been so corrupt that they never take seriously the mockery of the law of land.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Provisions of Right to Information act 2005 have been teethless in the regime of ongoing incumbent. The need of hour is to take a stringent action against the violators of the provisions of Right to Information act 2005 but it is unfortunate that because of corruption no accountable public functionaries are acting in the favour of Right to Information act 2005 but most of the corrupt public functionaries are hatching conspiracy to make the provisions of Right to Information act 2005 ineffective.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Undoubtedly it is violation of subsection 1 of section 19 which stipulates 30 days time to dispose of the appeal but here first appellate authority took three years. Great victory of Narendra Modi Sir.

    ReplyDelete

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

PIO directorate women welfare returned arbitrarily online submitted RTI Communique to conceal its wrongdoings

  Preeti Singh <preetisinghgaharwar@gmail.com> PIO directorate women welfare Uttar Pradesh returned arbitrarily online submitted RTI C...