UPSIC itself impediment in providing information to information seekers as arbitrarily returning appeals through registrar






Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2020/0954715
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
02/11/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Prime Ministers Office
Grievance Description
Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.

Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 31/10/2020 is arbitrary and illegal.

The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows.

1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.

2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.

3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter.

Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows respectively.

1-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as forwarded by the department of justice under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. Vide attached document to the representation.

2- The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation.

3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is subject of commission.

But appellant affirms that no appeal, he submitted before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter.

Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach betterment to society.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
27/11/2020
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित AVEDAK KA AVEDAN AKHYA PRAPT KAR NISTARIT KARK PATRA PRESHIT KR DIYA GAYA HAI PATRA KI PDF PRATI SANGLAGAN HAI
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
श्री मान जी उत्तर प्रदेश सूचना आयोग सिर्फ भ्रष्टाचार का अड्डा है और होगा भी क्यों नहीं जब आप अधिकारिओं को सूचना आयुक्त व मुख्य सूचना आयुक्त बनायेगे तो श्री मान जी आप बताये किसी भी व्यथा का निवारण उसकी प्रस्तुति के अनुसार और उसके गन दोष की विवेचना के आधार पर होता है यथा राजा तथा प्रजा की कहावत पूर्ण रूप से चरितार्थ है उत्तर प्रदेश सूचना आयोग में व्यथा निवारण के नाम पर तोते की भाति रटा रटाया आख्या प्रस्तुत कर दिया गया और सम्बंधित मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय ने उसे स्वीकार कर लिया आँख और कान बंद करके क्या यही सुशासन की पहचान है श्री मान जी यह ब्यथा भारत के प्रधान मंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी सर को सम्बोधित था इसलिए कम से कम उनकी तो इज्जत करते सोचिये जिस अधिकारी को यही समझ में नहीं आया की प्रार्थना पत्र में लिखा क्या है वह निस्तारण क्या करेगा मै समझता हूँ यह दोष अक्षम अधिकारिओं की चाटुकारिता के आधार पर पोस्टिंग की वजह से है जोकि सरकार के जिम्मेदारों द्वारा खुद पल्लवित और पुष्पित हो रहा है सोचिये आर टी आई प्रार्थना पत्र और प्रथम अपील दोनों द्वितीय अपील के साथ संलग्न थे किन्तु मनमाने तरीके से आयोग ने
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskarpandey2214@gmail.com
Contact Number
2226350
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2020/36913
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
20/11/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution? Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
17/12/2020
Remarks
no igrs
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
IGRS is the abbreviation of integrated grievance redress system, which Hindi translation is एकीकृत व्यथा निवारण तंत्र अर्थात समस्त समस्याओं का एक निदान केंद्र किन्तु बड़े आश्चर्य की बात है की आप कह रहे है की राज्य सूचना आयोग की आराजकता की शिकायत इस केंद्र पर नहीं की जा सकती है बहुत ही आश्चर्यजनक है और विस्मय कारी है खास तौर से मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय का यह रिपोर्ट जो की स्थापित लोकतांत्रिक मूल्यों के विरुद्ध है यह प्रशासक की बहुत बड़ी अयोग्यता है की वह प्रजा की समस्याओं से दूर भागे क्योकि वह भ्रष्ट राज्य कर्मचारिओं के प्रभाव में संज्ञा शून्य हो चुका हो चुका हो राज्य सूचना आयोग की आराजकता किसी तरह से नजर अंदाज करने लायक नहीं है UPSIC is flooded with incompetent staff who are inefficient to process to appeals and complaints submitted before it. Undoubtedly it is fact that they are so incompetent that can not understand the contents of the grievances as they are submitting the same parrot reply without taking the perusal of the representations.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskarpandey2214@gmail.com
Contact Number
2226350
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

4 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. IGRS is the abbreviation of integrated grievance redress system, which Hindi translation is एकीकृत व्यथा निवारण तंत्र अर्थात समस्त समस्याओं का एक निदान केंद्र किन्तु बड़े आश्चर्य की बात है की आप कह रहे है की राज्य सूचना आयोग की आराजकता की शिकायत इस केंद्र पर नहीं की जा सकती है बहुत ही आश्चर्यजनक है और विस्मय कारी है खास तौर से मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय का यह रिपोर्ट जो की स्थापित लोकतांत्रिक मूल्यों के विरुद्ध है यह प्रशासक की बहुत बड़ी अयोग्यता है की वह प्रजा की समस्याओं से दूर भागे क्योकि वह भ्रष्ट राज्य कर्मचारिओं के प्रभाव में संज्ञा शून्य हो चुका हो चुका हो राज्य सूचना आयोग की आराजकता किसी तरह से नजर अंदाज करने लायक नहीं है

    ReplyDelete
  2. Undoubtedly Uttar Pradesh state information commission is playing negative role as they are arbitrarily returning the appeal submitted before them through their registrar which is not a good practice because Public Information officers are not providing information because of such practices as they know that no action will be taken against them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Our motive to introduce the right to Information act 2005 was to promote transparency and accountability in the public offices but it seems that because of corruption our public functionaries are failed to implement The Right to Information act 2005 properly which is the root cause wrongdoer Public Information officers are not being punished Under The Right to Information act 2005 and no information is being made available.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How can it be justified that Uttar Pradesh state information commission may return the appeal of the appellant arbitrarily on the false and fabricated ground which is quite obvious from the post and most surprising is that they are submitting arbitrary reply to the grievances forwarded to them and most surprising is that a government itself showing a lackadaisical approach to redress the grievances.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post