google-site-verification: google652ee2e18330a276.html Yogi as anti-corruption crusader: Corruption prevailed in office of Banking Ombudsman must be curbed otherwise economic offences will remain on peak

Monday, 8 March 2021

Corruption prevailed in office of Banking Ombudsman must be curbed otherwise economic offences will remain on peak

 












Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2021/03185

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
13/01/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description
Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Fraud

Department/Bank/Financial Institute : Reserve Bank of India
-----------------------
Who submitted Complaint Number: 202021011014657 must be disclosed by Banking Ombudsman Kanpur?
Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657
The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint.

Here this question arises that who submitted this complaint to mislead the applicant and manage the subsequent grievance of aggrieved Anjali Kumari disposed of?
For detail vide attached document to the grievance.
Subsequent complaint elaborating the lacunae and mistake in the disposal of aforementioned complaint made before the Banking Ombudsman to rectify the error might cause travesty of justice.

Subsequent complaint Number-202021011010419

Date of complaint-14-Oct-2020
This complaint is still pending in the office of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur.
Corrupt dealing of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur-Complaint dated- 14-Oct-2020 of the applicant is pending before the B. O. Kanpur BUT Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657 SUBMITTED on 19-Nov-2020, they disposed of
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
18/01/2021
Remarks
Complaint number 202021011014657 and 202021011010419 were duplicate of complaint number 201920011032606 and all three complaints were received via mail id of yogimpsingh@gmail.com. Your complaint 201920011032606 was closed u/c 13(1)(A) of BOS-2006 and so remaining 2 other complaints being duplicate of this complaint were also closed.
Rating
Poor
Rating Remarks
Whatever facts raised by the applicant are having substance but reply is quite inconsistent and arbitrary so representation may be forwarded to senior rank officer as concerned with the deep rooted corruption. Applicant raised matter by providing cogent evidences attached to the representation which were overlooked by the concerned staff to put carpet on the acts concerns the corruption. Our motive to root out corruption can never be achieved if accountable functionaries of the government will act in caucus with corrupt functionaries. Undoubtedly three online complaints submitted containing my email but only two submitted by me. This corrupt act was committed by colluding with the office of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur ipso facto. The need hour is that an enquiry may be ordered in the matter to put light on the wrongdoings of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
DEABD/E/A/21/0000482
Appeal Text
Three complaints submitted online and two of them disposed of by Banking Ombudsman Kanpur. One of them was my first complaint but the second complaint disposed of only done by writing my email not by me it may be staff of Banking Ombudsman as it was submitted by taking Banking Ombudsman Kanpur in good faith. My second complaint was submitted earlier but not disposed of by Banking Ombudsman but this complaint disposed of till the date of submission.
Current Status
Appeal Received
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Pankaj Kumar Nayak
Officer Designation
Banking Ombudsman_Kanpur
Contact Address
Email Address
obo.kanpur@rbi.org.in
Contact Number
05122305174

Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/72366

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
06/12/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description
Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Fraud

Department/Bank/Financial Institute : Reserve Bank of India
-----------------------
Complaint no–201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 Aggrieved applicant submitted a representation on 03/02/2020 by appearing in person as directed by Lucknow head office of S.B.I. and State Bank of India is procrastinating on the issue. Where is inordinate delay if application/complaint submitted against the inaction of S.B.I. on the representation dated 03/02/2020 of aggrieved student on 22/06/2020? I think the Banking ombudsman made that more procrastination itself, ipso facto from attached documents.
For more detail, visit on this page.
Rs.12900 was drawn from the account of S.C. girl Anjali Kumari from Sirsa Branch of S.B.I. now running away
After the indiscriminate decision of the Banking Ombudsman Kanpur by taking the recourse of the limitation falsely, disposed of the aforementioned complaint arbitrarily.
Subsequent complaint elaborating the lacunae and mistake in the disposal of aforementioned complaint made before the Banking Ombudsman to rectify the error might
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
15/12/2020
Remarks
As complainant made inordinate delay in reporting the disputed transaction to the bank and so no relief can be granted to the complainant. And so the aforementioned complaint was rejected u/c 13(1)(a) of BOS-2006
Rating
Poor
Rating Remarks
Whether following is not forgery committed by the corrupt coterie of banking ombudsman concerned and his reluctance Closure letter - Complaint Number: 202021011014657 The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint. Here this question arises that who submitted this complaint to mislead the applicant and manage the subsequent grievance of aggrieved Anjali Kumari disposed of? It seems that Banking Ombudsman is layman to understand the content of the complaints made by the aggrieved people. It is quite obvious they hatched conspiracy to mislead the representative of the aggrieved student Anjali Kumari quite obvious from the attached screenshots with the post but it is unfortunate that our accountable public functionaries will remain failed to take action against the wrongdoer staff and banking ombudsman is working like a corrupt public functionary and his accountability must be checked as his actions are quite suspicious and mysterious and invites investigation in the matter.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Pankaj Kumar Nayak
Officer Designation
Banking Ombudsman_Kanpur
Contact Address
Email Address
obo.kanpur@rbi.org.in
Contact Number
05122305174




2 comments:

  1. Whether following is not forgery committed by the corrupt coterie of banking ombudsman concerned and his reluctance Closure letter - Complaint Number: 202021011014657 The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint. Here this question arises that who submitted this complaint to mislead the applicant and manage the subsequent grievance of aggrieved Anjali Kumari to get disposed of?

    ReplyDelete
  2. There are burning questions which must be replied by the office of banking ombudsman Kanpur like who submitted the third application and Under whose pressure banking ombudsman Kanpur disposed off this application before the application of the applicant Yogi MP Singh. Undoubtedly in the third application there is email of yogi MP Singh but it does not prove that he has submitted this application and when he is denying it then it must be investigated. He himself demanding the enquiry into the matter.

    ReplyDelete

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Junior engineer development authority Mirzapur seeking 1 lakh bribe from Tantrik K. P Singh for construction of a temple in the Mirzapur

  भारत सरकार Government of India कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत और पेंशन मंत्रालय Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Eng CPGRAMS W...