Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2020/23713
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
06/08/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
How the huge admission fee and other charges by money minting institutions are justified when students are not attending classes and institutions have no infrastructure to teach online.
An application on behalf of children making efforts to take admission but not succeeding because of the huge illogical fee being charged by the money-minting institutions in this crisis hours of Coronavirus pandemic. Please take a glance of detail representation attached to this grievance. Matter is concerned with the central and state governments.
The matter is concerned with the Lions School managed by a club of rich people located at Laldiggi District Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh and made on the Land of municipality Mirzapur city charging huge admission fee range between Rs.20000 to Rs.30000 even during the Corona Virus Pandemic. Detail representation is attached. Whether the institutions conforming the basic norms to teach online if not how the huge fee is charged from guardians of students.
Whether the government of Uttar Pradesh and the government of India are not mute spectators of the exploitation of vulnerable students by these money minting institutions run by the club of rich people and having the blessings of corrupt public functionaries.
Whether the government will explain that the aforementioned private management run school has created an infrastructure to run online classes of students as both school management and government functionaries are advocating online classes but not talking of norms set up to teach online classes.
Whether it is not planned conspiracy to loot the innocent and gullible guardians of the vulnerable students by money-minting institutions in caucus with the corrupt public functionaries of the governments.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
14/10/2020
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित आप का प्रकरण बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद कार्यालय से सम्बन्धित नहीं है
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Following report submitted by the public authority Central Board of Secondary Education which categorically states that regulation of fee comes under the ambit of the government of the state. In this connection, it is informed that CBSE is an examination conducting body which affiliates schools for the conduct of secondary and senior secondary school examination on fulfilment of norms prescribed in CBSE Affiliation Bye-laws. As per Rule 7.6 of CBSE Affiliation Bye-laws, 2018 the acts ad regulations of the Central and State UT Governments enacted framed in connection with the regulation of fee in respect of various categories of schools situated in the state will apply to the school affiliated with CBSE also. Hence, the matter regarding fee regulation comes under the jurisdiction of the concerned State Education Department. The grievance is being forwarded to Department of Secondary Education, Uttar Pradesh.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskarpandey2214@gmail.com
Contact Number
2226350
Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)
Reminder Date
Remarks
10/09/2020
Current Status Under process Date of Action 06/08/2020 Remarks Grievance received by Subordinate Organization from Web API Sir today is 10 Sept 2020 which means one month five days passed but still no decision taken by the concerned on the matter. Respected Sir, you are also silent on the issue which means concerned are procrastinating on the matter in caucus with the monitoring bodies. How can accountable public functionaries be mute spectators of open loot of money minting institutions in the state of Uttar Pradesh whose chief minister claims to provide transparent, honest and accountable governance before the media but the actual fact is that public is crying because of rampant corruption where open loot of guardians by money minting institutions is allowed by the government functionaries.
Tags:
Truth
Whether really subject matter is implicit or system is submerged into corruption from top to bottom?
ReplyDeleteRemarks :- डाक्यूमेंट संलग्न नहीं है विषय अस्पष्ट
1- Grievance received by Subordinate Organisation from Web API. SPIO may provide the detail of this subordinate organization.
2- SPIO may provide the notings made on the aforementioned grievance and regarding the aforementioned grievance.
3- SPIO may provide the action taken report by the CMO and the detail of personnel processed the grievance in the CMO.
4- SPIO may provide the current status of the grievance if not available, then forward/ transfer communiqué under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 pursuing prescribed norm.
5- SPIO may provide information about whether citizen charter is being pursued or not in redressing the grievance.
Here it is quite obvious that public information officer denied the information to the information seeker on the flimsy ground that whatever information information seeker is seeking that is implicit.Think about the gravity of situation that matter concerns the deep rooted corruption as government of Uttar Pradesh has sold the public land to a money minting institution and that money minting institution is charging huge admission fee that is 30,000 from the students which is causing heavy burden to the guardians.
ReplyDeleteSir Right to Information act 2005 was brought up by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities. Whether in this way Government will ensure the transparency and accountability If the matter concerns the deep rooted corruption concerned accountable public functionaries will overlook as quite obvious that in this matter priceless land of the municipality Mirzapur city was sold by the government of Uttar Pradesh to a money minting institution.
ReplyDeleteIf the government of yogi is honest then they must reveal the transaction made between the money minting institution and the government but they are running away this implies that something is wrong in the dealing and what surprising is that earlier installed government in the state by Akhilesh Yadav banned the extension of the lease of the land. Why did Yogi government in the state provided the lease of next thirty years to the money minting institution.
ReplyDeleteIf they are honest they must provide the information to the information seeker so that public may have faith in the government machinery otherwise there is complete lawlessness and anarchy in the government machinery.
ReplyDelete